Tag Archives: Thomistic philosophy

The Classical Argument for Christ

Posted on May 10, 2018 by Mel Wild

I’ve posted a whole series on the classical argument for the existence of God. Of course, as a Christian, I often get asked, “So, even if this Prime Mover exists, why should I believe in the Christian “God? Why not … Continue reading →

Posted in Christian apologetics, Love, Theology | Tagged Christianity, Christology, classical theism, Jesus, metaphysics, Thomistic philosophy, Trinity | 227 Comments

The classical arguments for God – Part Five

Posted on April 24, 2018 by Mel Wild

This is the final installment in a series of posts where I’ve been attempting to explain some of the arguments for classical theism. The reason for this philosophical foray is because it’s the most logically consistent argument for God of any … Continue reading →

Posted in Christian apologetics | Tagged Argument for God, Attributes of God, ontology, Religion and Spirituality, Thomistic philosophy | 16 Comments

The classical arguments for God – Part Four

Posted on April 19, 2018 by Mel Wild

One thing I like about the classical arguments for God is that they’re logically deduced from our everyday experience. And when one fully understand them (which no detractor I’ve heard so far actually does), we see that asking for evidence … Continue reading →

Posted in Christian apologetics | Tagged Argument for God, Christianity, classical theism, contingency, ontology, Religion and Spirituality, Thomistic philosophy | 12 Comments

The classical arguments for God – Part Two

Posted on April 12, 2018 by Mel Wild

Logical argumentation is to metaphysics and philosophy what mathematical theorems are to theoretical physics and cosmology. For instance, in the field of quantum mechanics, we have very little hard “evidence” for what we believe to be true, and we may … Continue reading →

Posted in Christian apologetics | Tagged Argument for God, Christianity, classical theism, Religion and Spirituality, Thomistic philosophy | 176 Comments

The classical arguments for God – Part One

Posted on April 6, 2018 by Mel Wild

I talked about the atheist’s fallacious demand for evidence last time and what would constitute as logical evidence for God’s workings in the universe. It’s interesting that after three hundred or so comments, no atheist actually understood the classical theist’s … Continue reading →