Why do Socialists love using the word “democracy” so much? After all, there has never been anything “democratic” about actual Socialist regimes in history. Even today, all you have to do is look at Cuba and Venezuela to see what’s it’s done to these formerly free and prosperous countries. In practice, socialism and democracy are mutually exclusive terms.
I was listening to a “New Discourses” podcast by James Lindsay on this subject called, “The Woke Manipulation of Democracy” that got me thinking about this. I highly recommend that you listen to this if you have the time.
Before we get started, it’s important to note that America is NOT a democracy. It never was. Just because we keep using that word to explain our form of government doesn’t make it so. While we have democratic elements within our Constitution, we are a representative republic.
We misunderstand this point at our own peril. I talked about this in “Why the Electoral College STILL matters.” Our Founding Fathers were very clear that they did not want a democracy. This was founded on their careful study of democracies throughout history, understanding that pure democracies do NOT work. Historically, all of them eventually implode.
As Tara Ross, a lawyer and author who specializes on this subject, said:
“Democracy has been colorfully described as two wolves and a lamb voting on what’s for dinner. In a pure democracy, bare majorities can easily tyrannize the rest of the country.”
The current cancel culture and suppression of free speech by Big Tech is just a small foretaste of things to come from this kind of “democracy.”
Our general misunderstanding of our form of government is just one of the reasons why the “woke” left is so effective at manipulating us. According to Lindsey, they trade off the public’s expectation that words mean what they usually mean, while they have some specialized meaning to them. Words like tolerance, equity, racism, diversity, and inclusion means something quite different to them than their common meaning.
We’ll just refer to this as Orwellian “doublespeak.”
“It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.” (Orwell, 1984).
Take the word, “democracy” for example.
A Socialist politician may stand up and say, “We need more democracy!” And we might respond, yeah, that would be good.
But, according to Lindsay, “democracy” means something much more sinister when the woke neo-Marxist uses the word. It mean is that they will decide how everyone should live. And anyone who disagrees with their “concensus” either gets canceled or put in the gulag.
Again, all we have to do is look at governments who have embraced Socialism. They get your vote under the guise of “democracy,” but eventually turn tyrannical and the “common people” starve (or are shot).
As it’s been said,“You can easily vote your way into Socialism, but you must shoot your way out.”
If you naively think that Socialism is the way to go, just ask an immigrant from the former Soviet Union block countries, or refugees from Cuba and Venezuela, on what they think about your assumption.
Dr. Bella Dodd was a lawyer, union activist and member of a the US Communist Party from 1932 to 1949. She talks about how easy it is to get sucked into Socialism because it plays on our compassion for the underdog:
“The Communist support seems to be large because people are sucked into things which seem to be good in themselves. They don’t recognize that the Communist Party uses these slogans, these generalizations, in order to break down their resistance, and ultimately they are tied in with the Communist movement. Some were against discrimination. We are against repression, against war, against fascism, and the Communist Party takes our best instincts and uses them against us by twisting us into a program which they want us to follow.” (Testimony of Bella Dodd to HUAC in June 1953 in Columbus and November 1953 in Philadelphia (PDF)).*
Here’s a quote from Alexander Trachenberg on these word manipulations:
“When we get ready to take the United States, we will not take it under the label of Communism; we will not take it under the label of Socialism. These labels are unpleasant to the American people, and have been smeared too much. We will take the United States under the labels we have made very lovable; we will take it under liberalism, under progressivism, under democracy. But, take it we will.”—Alexander Trachtenberg, member of the CPUSA’s Central Control Committee, at the Communist Parties National Convention, Madison Square Garden, 1944*
Of course, Communism is just the end goal of Socialism.
It’s important we understand this in America right now, because like the frog being slowly cooked in the kettle; we’ve been slowly and methodically manipulated by these word slogans for decades. Josef Pieper said the following about this:
“The abuse of political power is fundamentally connected with the sophistic abuse of the word, indeed, finds in it the fertile soil in which to hide and grow and get ready, so much so that the latent potential of the totalitarian poison can be ascertained, as it were, by observing the symptom of public abuse of language. The degradation, too, of man through man, alarmingly evident in the acts of physical violence committed by all tyrannies, has its beginning, certainly much less alarmingly, at that almost imperceptible moment when the word loses its dignity.” —Josef Pieper, Abuse of Language – Abuse of Power, 1974*
There’s never been a more critical time in our nation’s history for some clear criticial thinking. And, as followers of Christ, we must not allow ourselves to be fooled by their clever twisting of words. Socialism is an anti-Christ religion at its very core.
“Socialism is precisely the religion that must kill Christianity. [It is a] religion in th sense that it too is a faith…[and] because it has substituted for the consciousness of the transcendental God of the Catholics, trust in man and his best strengths as the sole spiritual reality.”—Antonio Gramsci, “Audacia e Fede”*
That last quote makes me shudder knowing the Christian Christian churches are embracing his philosophy in CRT and don’t even know it.
It is very troubling. This is why need to understand the “water we’re swimming in” and not just go along with the popular slogans that play on our compassion and sense of fairness. This is what neo-Marxist ideologies like CRT play on. No one wants to be considered a racist, so we ignorantly support something that is diametrically opposed to what we say we believe. Ironically, we end up supporting something that itself is racist and bigoted because it divides everyone according to what skin color they were born with.
Churches who embrace CRT have no understanding of where it came from. On the Gramsci quote you referenced, he was a forefather of the Frankfurt School, which eventually led to CRT. These people were all dedicated Marxists who saw Christianity as a threat that must be eliminated so that their utopian pipedream could come to fruition. It’s not only a pipedream, it’s absolutely evil.
It’s also no wonder why so many young people who go to college and are indoctrinated in socialist ideology also leave the faith. Socialism is the sworn enemy of Christianity.
Sorry for typos
No prob. I understood what you were saying. I do that all the time other people’s blogs!
Well said, Mel. I think we like words like “democracy” because it implies consent and the will of the people. So this must be a good thing, it’s the will of the people. That’s why calling something democracy is such a useful tool for brutal dictators. Everyone wants to be in lockstep, to go along with the crowd, to be part of something.
A few times I’ve had to go have a TB skin test, something I highly approve of, I totally agree with, I fully support, BUT you always have to sign this “informed consent ” form that basically says, “I voluntarily consent to this mandatory screening.” The test is nothing but the convoluted logic of that
crazy paperwork is liable to kill me! I guess the military guys have a word for it, “volun-told.” That’s where you’re ordered by force to do this totally voluntary thing and you consent to it because you haven’t got any choice.
“Volun-told.” LOL! Exactly. Democracy, to the woke left means forced compliance for everyone to their standard of “virtue.” And it’s not like we haven’t already gotten ample evidence of the dictatorial and totalarian nature of their ideology over the last several months. They want the government to force their insane critical theories on children and make elections so porious and devoid of any meaningful security or integrity that they stay in power all the time. And they call that “protecting democracy!” How is that any different than Hugo Chavez’s version of “democracy?” Hopefully, Americans are waking up to their word games and seeing the fruit of this evil tree.
Democrats have a love-hate relationship with the military. When they win elections, they love to use the military for their damnable social engineering. They hate the military because most service members vote against them. We know them for what they are, mad with and for power.
I love it Brother Mel and especially the fact that you weren’t afraid to bring out the distinction. We have ALWAYS been a constitutional Republic and if we truly let that go, we ARE in trouble! 😉
“Why do Socialists love using the word “democracy” so much?”
Because they want to deceive those who are not socialists yet.
Because they want to create the impression that what they want is what the people want even if the people reject what they want.
Because they want to give legitimacy to their regimes in the eyes of the world.
(North Korea calls itself the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. East Germany called itself the German Democratic Republic)
What socialists really mean by democracy is:
The people are too stupid to know what is good for them and even too stupid to know what they want.
We, the enlightened ones, the elite, know what’s best for the people and what the people really want. Therefore, the people rule through us as the true representatives of the will of the people.
That’s perfect democracy, isn’t it?
You pretty much summed it up.
Wow that quote in the end…and I just wrote today (7/29) against a woke Christian, establishing that Gramsci is a Marxist….even though the Left “Christians” say he isn’t…strange
Gramsci was the father of neo-Marxism (cultural Marxism). Anyone who says he wasn’t a Marxist has never read his stuff. He was very much a committed Marxist.
Yep! 100 percent!
Thanks for reading and commenting on my blog; people have been telling me that Joel (the person I was responding to in the post) saw my post and hopefully what you said is further helpful for him concerning Gramsci’s relationship to Marxism
I hope so, too. Blessings.
God bless you!
Pingback: Fascism and Communism: two sides of the same coin | In My Father's House
Pingback: The Culture of Fear (and its antidote) | In My Father's House