Did God kill Jesus? Part one

Father_forgive_themThis is the first of my “red pill” posts, looking at the question, “Did God kill Jesus?” The reason for my provocative question is because this is a central tenet of the popular atonement theory called Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA).

If you’re like almost all Christians in the Western world who’ve studied why Jesus had to die for us, PSA is what you were taught and embraced. This paradigm is fully enmeshed in our gospel message, what we hear everyday in sermons in our churches, on the radio, TV, Internet, books, and what we sing about in our worship songs. It’s almost unquestioningly assumed to be THE understanding of why Jesus did what He did. I embraced and even taught this view myself for over 30 years.

I already did a series on the atonement called “Saving Easter,” so I will try not to duplicate a lot of what I said there, although some overlap will be necessary. I also gave you some terminology in my introduction that will be helpful in this series. Please read that post first if you haven’t already done so.

I would like to be able to ask you to read this with fresh eyes, without any bias, as if you never heard any atonement theory before. But since this is impossible, I only ask that you read with the awareness you already have a bias, and that it may make it difficult for you to accept what I’m proposing, even if my position is clearly shown to be the more accurate one.

Let’s turn our focus now to the question: “Did God kill Jesus?” You can probably guess what my answer will be by the above graphic, but in order to prove this to you, we will look at Isaiah 53.

Before we dig into the details, let’s step back and see the big picture.

Isaiah 53—the big picture

Isaiah 53 is often referred to as the “Suffering Servant” passage (technically, Isaiah 52:13-53:12, but here we’ll just refer to it as “Isaiah 53”).

What was the purpose of the Messiah’s suffering in Isaiah 53? The PSA proponents would say it was to suffer the full fury of God’s anger and wrath in our place so that we could be forgiven.

Fortunately, in the case of Isaiah 53, Scripture interprets itself. Matthew gives us the divine commentary on its fulfillment in his gospel account (bold type added):

“When evening had come, they brought to Him many who were demon-possessed. And He cast out the spirits with a word, and healed all who were sick,  that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying:
“He Himself took our infirmities
And bore our sicknesses.” (Matt. 8:16-17; cf. Isa. 53:4, NKJV)

Did you catch that? Matthew seems to think that Isaiah 53 was all about DELIVERANCE and HEALING. Jesus demonstrated, by casting out demons and healing the sick, that He came to heal us and free us from Satan’s bondage.

The Greek word for “infirmities” is ἀσθένεια (astheneia). It can mean weakness, feebleness (1 Cor. 15:43); bodily infirmity, state of ill health, sickness (Matt. 8:17; Luke. 5:15); metaphorical infirmity, frailty, imperfection, intellectual and moral (Rom. 6:19; 1 Cor. 2:3; Heb. 5:2; 7:28); suffering, affliction, distress, calamity (Rom. 8:26).

The Greek word for “sicknesses” is νόσος (nosos), meaning disease, sickness, or distemper (Matt. 4:23, 24; 8:17; 9:35).

In addition, the Greek word for “save” is σῴζω (sōzō). It’s used throughout the New Testament as follows: to rescue; to preserve safe and unharmed (Matt. 8:25; 10:22; 24:22; 27:40, 42, 49; 1 Tim. 2:15); to cure, heal, restore to health (Matt. 9:21, 22; Mark 5:23, 28, 34; 6:56).

Healed, set free, made whole, placed in perfect union with Christ!

What’s in view here is that Jesus took our BROKEN CONDITION called sin–our sickness, disease, weaknesses and alienation, in order to RESCUE us and bring us into perfect union with Himself. He came to restore us to our intended purpose, although this purpose was never seen before Christ (Eph.1:4-5; Col.1:15; Heb.2:10). Let’s apply this definition to some of the key verses in Isaiah 53 (Words in CAPS added):

Surely He has borne our BROKEN CONDITION,
And carried our BROKEN CONDITION” (Isa. 53:4a)

And the Lord has laid on Him the BROKEN CONDITION of us all. (Isa. 53:6c)

For He was cut off from the land of the living;
For the BROKEN CONDITION of My people He was stricken. (Isa. 53:8b)

He shall see the labor of His soul, and be satisfied.
By His knowledge My righteous Servant shall justify many,
For He shall bear their BROKEN CONDITION. (Isaiah 53:11)

This view would agree with what the early church father’s believed, and what the Eastern Orthodox church still believes. To quote Gregory of Nazianzus (329-389 AD):

For that which He [Christ] has not assumed He has not healed;  but that which is united to His Godhead is also saved.  If only half Adam fell, then that which Christ assumes and saves may be half also; but if the whole of his nature fell, it must be united to the whole nature of Him that was begotten, and so be saved as a whole (Ep. CI, To Cledonius the Priest Against Apollinarius; NPNF Series 2 Vol. VII p. 440).

I know this is foreign to our Catholic/Protestant ears, so I will translate. Mankind was damaged through sin. Christ came to assume the entirety of that condition, healing our broken condition by fusing it to divinity.

This has to do with hypostatic union, which we can talk more about another time. The point being, nowhere does Matthew suggest that Isaiah was talking about God having to kill Jesus so that He could forgive us.

Beloved, God is not like some pagan deity that must be appeased by throwing virgins into the volcano so he doesn’t burn our village. He’s a GOOD Father. He is called Love, and Love sent His eternal Son to HEAL us and make us His. I will show that this view is consistent with Jesus’ teachings and how He revealed the true nature of His Father.

I know, you’re thinking about Isaiah 53:10. We will get to that. For now, I just want you to consider the big picture.

Advertisements

About Mel Wild

God's favorite (and so are you), a son and a father, happily married to the same beautiful woman for 36 years. We have three incredible adult children. My passion is pursuing the Father's heart in Christ and giving it away to others. My favorite pastime is being iconoclastic and trailblazing the depths of God's grace. I'm also senior pastor of Cornerstone Church in Wisconsin.
This entry was posted in Father Heart of God, Theology and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Did God kill Jesus? Part one

  1. Lance says:

    Way to go Mel. I love the red pill! Yay God!

    • Mel Wild says:

      Thanks. For most people it may take a while to assimilate because it’s new to our Western ears and eyes (I know it’s not to you). Jesus said nobody likes the new wine at first, but the new is better. 🙂
      Faithful questioning is better than blind agreement.

      Neo: Why do my eyes hurt?
      Morpheus: You’ve never used them before.

  2. H says:

    Loving this series. Can’t wait to learn more! I like that quote from the movie above. It really does feel like that sometimes! 🙂

    • Mel Wild says:

      Thanks. After I posted the quote I thought it may have come off as a bit condescending. I didn’t mean it that way. What I meant is that it takes a while for a new paradigm to sink in, especially after living under assumptions you thought were biblical all your life.

      I have been studying atonement theories for several years after I found untenable contradictions and even falsities with the PSA I myself grew up with. In my view, we cannot rightly know the Father’s love and our union in Christ and embrace PSA. They are incompatible.

      But even if what I’m saying is right, at first it will sound wrong, even heretical. Any new paradigm is hard to assimilate at first and can even be painful to grasp, so to speak. This is why most won’t even try. It’s always easier to go with the status quo. But I believe that the more you use “fresh eyes” of faith, the more this will make much more sense. I’ve been at this a long time so I understand the pain of having to see something new.

      I believe this is much more accurate picture of what God has done for us, so going through this process is worth it. I also believe this view will only endear us to God even more and help us to embrace a Father more fully, who has been cast in a very bad light with PSA. Hope that all made sense. Blessings.

  3. H says:

    Yes, it all makes sense. 🙂 Thank you! Even as little as two years ago I would not for a moment considered the possibility that what I had been taught all my life was incorrect, inaccurate. I would have thought that anyone trying to tell me all of the things I’ve been learning in the last six months to be completely wrong. (No offense to any of you. 🙂 ) Now it’s like I am finally beginning to “see” things for the first time. At first, like you said, these conecepts are difficult to grasp. God likes me?? He’s not mad at me?? We are all included in His love, in Himself?? But it is wonderful to learn and to begin to understand just a fraction of how much God loves me and all of us. Sometimes I just feel like scrubbing at my eyes because I know I am failing to see something important, but I just can’t get it! 😀 And then at another point I’ll have an “aha” moment and it’s amazing. Everything that happened through Jesus’ birth, life, death, resurrection and ascension was done through his incredible love for us!

  4. Reblogged this on Lessons by Heart and commented:
    God radically changed what I believe about Him this last year. Mel explains it well. As with the noble Bereans, let us receive the word with all readiness, and search the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things are so. (Acts 17:11) \o/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s