Did Paul consider himself a sinner?

The_Apostle_Paul_-_RembrandtWas Paul, the apostle, trying to identify himself as the “worst” of sinners in 1 Timothy 1:15? Did he consider himself just a “sinner saved by grace” like many evangelical Christians do today. I know I thought that for most of my Christian life.

This post is in response to comments from my last post, where I mentioned that, in Christ, we’re no longer to consider ourselves as sinners (even though we may still sin.) This is an important topic that deserves attention because it cuts to the heart of how we see ourselves in Christ.

Many who hold this popular “sinner saved by grace” view of themselves point to 1 Timothy 1:15-16 as their proof-text. Hopefully, I can convince you that this is a faulty understanding of the text. I will give three reasons as follows:

1. Translation
2. Context
3. Identity

Let’s look at them one at a time.

1. Translation

Most English translations render verse 15 with one of these three variations (bold-type added):

“…that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.” (KJV)

“…Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners—of whom I am the worst.” (NIV)

“that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, among whom I am foremost of all.” (NASB)

It looks pretty straightforward on the surface, but we have some translation problems here. The Greek word translated “worst” or “chief” or “foremost” is πρῶτος (prōtos, where we get the word, “prototype”). It was never used by Paul to mean “worst” or “chief” anywhere else in his writings. Paul always used this word in its primary meaning, as “first” (first in time, place, in any succession of things or of persons” – see Rom.1:8. 16; 2:9-10; 3:2; 10:9; 1 Cor.14:30; 15:45.47; Phil.1:5; 1 Tim.2:13; 5:12; 2 Tim.4:16).

For instance, just one chapter later, Paul uses the same word to say that “Adam was created first” (1 Tim.2:13).

Why say “worst” or “chief” here? The translators possibly translated it “worst” or “chief” because literally rendering it as “first of sinners” didn’t make sense and “worst” fit their doctrinal paradigm. The NASB says “foremost,” which is slightly closer to what I think Paul was trying to say, but it still isn’t clear.

Regardless of the reason, was Paul saying he was currently the worst sinner in the Roman Empire? Worse than Nero? I hardly think so.

2. Context

The next thing we need to look at is the context. Let’s see what Paul says in verses 12-14.  I put the key words in bold type.

 12 I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who has strengthened me, because He considered me faithful, putting me into service, 13 even though I was formerly a blasphemer and a persecutor and a violent aggressorYet I was shown mercy because I acted ignorantly in unbelief; 14 and the grace of our Lord was more than abundant, with the faith and love which are found in Christ Jesus.” (NASB)

Was Paul saying, “I’m still a blasphemer, persecutor and “violent aggressor?” No, that would inconsistent with all his other teachings. Paul was clearly reviewing his former life and contrasting that with his current ministry as an apostle, proving just how deep God’s mercy and grace will go to save someone acting so heinously as himself.

Paul is basically saying, if God can save me, His poster child for amazing grace, He can save anybody!

This is why I think that the Message paraphrase of 1 Tim.1:15-16 actually gets it right, giving us the meaning of Paul’s statement, using the word πρῶτος (prōtos) consistently, and staying in context here (bold-type added).

“Here’s a word you can take to heart and depend on: Jesus Christ came into the world to save sinners. I’m proof—Public Sinner Number One—of someone who could never have made it apart from sheer mercy. And now he shows me off—evidence of his endless patience—to those who are right on the edge of trusting him forever.”

We have the proper context for verses 12-16 now. Paul, the apostle to the Gentiles—who also said he was “dead to sin” (Rom.6:6), “crucified with Christ” (Gal.2:20),  and a “new creation in Christ” (2 Cor.5:17)—is not making a case for still being the worst sinner in the Roman Empire. Rather, he’s contrasting his present life as a saint, to whom God faithfully “put into service” (vs.12), with his former life (vs.13-16).

Paul is essentially saying, “I am (currently) God’s “Exhibit A,”  proving His scandalous grace that transforms (into saints) even former blasphemers, persecutors and violent men like me!”

3. Identity

This is the most important reason we need to see this rightly, because calling ourselves “sinners” creates a huge identity conflict. We’re looking in the wrong direction, identifying with our old nature that’s dead and buried with Christ, not with our new nature in Him. We’re actually arguing with what God says about us. And behavior always follows how we see ourselves.

I’m not saying that I don’t sin anymore; I’m saying that’s not who I am anymore.

Thinking I’m a still a sinner creates the wrong expectation in my mind, that sinning is inevitable. It’s living on the wrong side of the cross, it sets up a contradiction that actually denies what Christ did on the cross. I’m telling myself that my only freedom from sin is when I die and go to heaven.

But as Georgian Banov astutely observed, “If we’re not set free from sin until we die then Jesus isn’t our savior, death is.”

Praise God, that isn’t what God says! (bold-type added)

knowing this, that our old self was crucified with Him, in order that our body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be slaves to sin;  for he who has died is freed from sin.(Rom.6:6-7 NASB)

Beloved, do you “know this“? If so, who are you going to believe? The popular preachers or God?

On the other hand, seeing myself “dead to sin and alive in Christ” transports me toward my true identity. Again, I’m not in denial about my current experience, but I’m “no longer regarding myself that way (2 Cor.5:16-17). I “know” now that sin only has power in my life by my permission. This is how we begin to walk in the Spirit, by walking in truth, not by parroting man-invented doctrines based on failure.

Again, I parroted this evangelical myth myself for most of my Christian life. But I no longer empower what Jesus disempowered on the cross by denying what He did for me and to me.

Beloved saint, called out of darkness by God’s mercy and grace, it doesn’t make you more humble to call yourself the “worst of sinners.” It’s confessing something no longer true about you, and I don’t think that’s what Paul meant either.

What makes us more Christ-like is identifying ourselves, by faith, with who we are, and where we are, in Christ. And that is truly glorious!

“Therefore if you have been raised up with Christ, keep seeking the things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Set your mind on the things above, not on the things that are on earth. For you have died and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ, who is our life, is revealed, then you also will be revealed with Him in glory.” (Col.3:1-4 NASB)

Advertisements

About Mel Wild

God's favorite (and so are you), a son and a father, happily married to the same beautiful woman for 36 years. We have three incredible adult children. My passion is pursuing the Father's heart in Christ and giving it away to others. My favorite pastime is being iconoclastic and trailblazing the depths of God's grace. I'm also senior pastor of Cornerstone Church in Wisconsin.
This entry was posted in Doctrine, Grace, Identity and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Did Paul consider himself a sinner?

  1. John Cummuta says:

    Amen! Either Jesus did it or he didn’t. It’s not still up to me to finish saving myself.

  2. “But as Georgian Banov astutely observed, “If we’re not set free from sin until we die then Jesus isn’t our savior, death is.””

    This is awesome…just simply awesome.

    Blessings
    John

  3. Simply put, we’re a saint saved by Grace.

    • Mel Wild says:

      Amen. I wholeheartedly agree with that one! We’re proof of God’s scandalous grace put on glorious display for all to see, not people who still don’t know what Jesus did for them and to them. Blessings.

  4. Brad Heath says:

    Mel well said. If believers could understand to see themselves AS GOD SEES THEM VS. HOW MAN SEES THEM all would be better off. Plain and simple sinner is a term of identification in Adam. The biggest reason people teach this junk is they are not or have not learned why believers sin. They do not understand God’s reconciliation. Many believe salvation is the forgiveness of sin. This is because they preach the cross and ignore the burial (the ushering of the New Covenant) and the Resurrection Life (other than Easter). Romans 5:10 states ‘salvation is life’.

    Brad Heath

    • Mel Wild says:

      Amen, Brad. Couldn’t agree with you more. It’s not sin problem; it’s an identification problem. We’re not part of the “Adam’s family” anymore. We’re a new creation in Christ–sons and daughters of our heavenly Father! Eternal life is being brought into relationship, it’s knowing the Father in Christ (John 17:3). Blessings.

  5. daniel says:

    Reblogged this on Daniel Lovett and commented:
    Reading this right now, and as someone who struggled with an Identity crisis for years I certainly appreciate the clarity of this post. I have been promoting people who preach the opposite, who still consistently and depressingly say, “I’m a sinner saved by grace, I’m the worst sinner I know, etc…” and then their actions inevetibly follow the way they see themselves. What do you think?

  6. Pingback: You are NOT a “caterpillar” saved by grace! | In My Father's House

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s